RECOGNIZING CONFERENCE SERVICE

The service leaderboard.

The people helping computer science conferences happen.

10 per conference edition1 per additional conference role3 per workshop organized

Three conference roles in one edition earn 12 points. One role in each of two editions earns 20. Organizing a workshop earns 3 points, independently of main-conference service; workshop-only service does not receive the 10-point edition base. Each named workshop counts once per host edition. Duplicate copies of the same appointment do not count. Undated standing committees are excluded. All time includes published future-edition appointments. Recent views use completed calendar years, excluding the current year and future editions.

This ranks indexed service, not research quality, workload, or all researchers. Conference coverage and identity reconciliation are incomplete; scores change as records are added or corrected. Sources & coverage →

Rankings

All indexed years · ties share a rank

85699 ranked profiles · Showing 1–100Highest score first

All indexed years: people ranked by ten points per conference edition, one per additional conference role, and three per workshop organized
Rank	Person	Editions	Extra roles	Workshops	Score
1	Yu Hua	43	0	2	436
2	Lieven Eeckhout	41	5	0	415
3	Boris Grot	37	1	5	386
4	Onur Mutlu	33	2	12	368
5	Rajeev Balasubramonian	35	3	0	353
6	John Kim	35	2	0	352
7	Pradip Bose	33	4	4	346
8	Jung Ho Ahn	33	3	0	333
9	Murali Annavaram	33	0	0	330
10	Karu Sankaralingam	32	0	0	320
11	Alaa Alameldeen	31	2	0	312
11	Christina Delimitrou	31	2	0	312
13	Josep Torrellas	30	3	1	306
14	Engin Ipek	30	3	0	303
15	Daniel Sorin	30	2	0	302
15	Radu Teodorescu	30	2	0	302
17	Daniel Jimenez	29	1	0	291
18	Mattan Erez	28	3	0	283
19	Abdullah Muzahid	28	2	0	282
20	Dmitry Ponomarev	28	1	0	281
20	Paul Gratz	28	1	0	281
20	Xipeng Shen	28	1	0	281
23	Ramon Canal	28	0	0	280
24	Mainak Chaudhuri	27	3	0	273
25	Antonio Gonzalez	27	2	0	272
25	Jian Huang	27	2	0	272
25	Natalie Enright Jerger	27	2	0	272
28	Daniel Sanchez	27	1	0	271
28	Jangwoo Kim	27	1	0	271
28	Michael Ferdman	27	1	0	271
28	Trey Cain	27	1	0	271
32	Benjamin Lee	27	0	0	270
33	Sudarsun Kannan	26	3	1	266
34	Dimitris Gizopoulos	26	0	1	263
34	John Carter	26	3	0	263
36	Minsoo Rhu	26	2	0	262
36	Omer Khan	26	2	0	262
38	Vijay Janapa Reddi	26	0	0	260
39	Saugata Ghose	25	6	0	256
40	Aamer Jaleel	25	2	1	255
40	Adrian Sampson	25	2	1	255
40	Akanksha Jain	25	2	1	255
43	Yuan Xie	25	1	1	254
44	Jaehyuk Huh	25	3	0	253
45	Jishen Zhao	25	1	0	251
46	Hyesoon Kim	24	4	2	250
46	Mahmut Kandemir	25	0	0	250
48	Guru Venkataramani	24	2	0	242
48	Yanos Sazeides	24	2	0	242
50	Huiyang Zhou	24	1	0	241
50	Myoungsoo Jung	24	1	0	241
52	Mohit Tiwari	24	0	0	240
53	David Kaeli	23	2	1	235
54	Nael Abu-Ghazaleh	23	3	0	233
55	Anand Sivasubramaniam	23	2	0	232
55	Tushar Krishna	23	2	0	232
57	Eric Rotenberg	23	1	0	231
57	Foutse Khomh	21	12	3	231
57	Stefanos Kaxiras	23	1	0	231
60	Chita Das	23	0	0	230
60	Edward Suh	23	0	0	230
60	Koji Inoue	23	0	0	230
63	Jakub Szefer	22	2	2	228
64	Aravind Machiry	22	1	1	224
65	Ashish Venkat	22	2	0	222
65	Erik Altman	22	2	0	222
65	Tor Aamodt	22	2	0	222
68	Dongyoon Lee	22	1	0	221
68	Gilles Pokam	22	1	0	221
68	Nikos Hardavellas	22	1	0	221
68	Yipeng Huang	22	1	0	221
72	James Hoe	22	0	0	220
72	Jun Yang	22	0	0	220
72	Mairieli Wessel	21	7	1	220
72	Satish Narayanasamy	22	0	0	220
72	Xiapu Luo	22	0	0	220
72	Xuehai Qian	22	0	0	220
72	Yoav Etsion	22	0	0	220
79	Sudhanva Gurumurthi	21	6	0	216
80	Hung-Wei Tseng	21	2	1	215
80	Jason Clemons	21	2	1	215
82	Sreenivas Subramoney	21	2	0	212
83	Emre Ozer	21	1	0	211
83	Pierre Michaud	21	1	0	211
85	Brandon Lucia	21	0	0	210
85	Chia-Lin Yang	21	0	0	210
85	Joe Devietti	21	0	0	210
85	Per Stenstrom	21	0	0	210
85	Ravi Rajwar	21	0	0	210
90	Paul Chow	20	3	0	203
91	Carole-Jean Wu	20	1	0	201
91	Marios Kogias	19	5	2	201
91	Mike O'Connor	20	1	0	201
91	Yungang Bao	20	1	0	201
95	Antonia Zhai	20	0	0	200
95	Joshua San Miguel	20	0	0	200
95	Li-Shiuan Peh	20	0	0	200
95	Rakesh Kumar	20	0	0	200
95	Scott Mahlke	20	0	0	200
95	Trevor Carlson	20	0	0	200

Equal scores share a rank; alphabetical order within a tie does not break it. Open a profile to inspect the appointments and their sources.